ReliaSim
Reliability and bottleneck simulation for manufacturing lines; run experiments, sweep buffers.
| Endpoint | https://reliasim.com/mcp (streamable-http) |
|---|---|
| Registry version | 1.0.0 |
| Now | 7 tools · grade A (91) · pin ts_31089954f345c04b6fc94ee89d7dc4dc · protocol 2024-11-05 |
| First / last listed | 2026-10-26 01:17 UTC / 2026-10-26 01:17 UTC |
| Grade over time | 2026-10-26: A (91), 7 tools |
Is this your server? Own a server? ToolFit hosted watch re-checks it every 24 h ($0.25 per 30 days) or 6 h ($0.60) and sends you an HMAC-signed webhook when its tools or grade change: POST https://api.youraitools.co/toolfit/v1/watch. To opt out, see About & opt-out.
Tools: find_bottleneck get_chapter_facts get_chapter_narrative run_gain_loss run_buffer_tradeoff explain_concept compare_chapters
find_bottleneck | Single Run bottleneck analysis for the selected chapter — which node has the worst availability, per-interrupt downtime split, throughput, OEE. All eight chapters return verified dys-cli sales-prototype numbers. ANTI-FABRICATION: numbers in the response are canonical reference values from real dys-cli engine runs. Quote them VERBATIM. Do not round, estimate, or recall from training data. For follo params: chapter |
get_chapter_facts | Structural facts of the selected chapter — topology, rate limits, interrupt distributions, expected efficiency. Use when the user asks about the line's configuration. ANTI-FABRICATION: rates and distributions are verified .aidos-file values. Quote VERBATIM; do not estimate or substitute training-data recall. params: chapter |
get_chapter_narrative | Long-form narrative for the selected chapter — what the chapter adds to the complexity ladder and the key teaching point. Use when the user asks 'walk me through this' or wants the conceptual primer. Pure prose, no numerical claims; safe to summarize. params: chapter |
run_gain_loss | Gain/Loss experiment — disable each interrupt one at a time, measure production recovered. Reveals the ACTUAL impact of each failure mode (Gain ≠ Loss: removing one lets others fire more often). Available on `bs1-leds`, `bs3-leds`, `bs4-ct`, `bs4-leds`. Use when the user asks 'what if we fixed X?' / 'which interrupt matters most if we actually fixed it?' / 'show me the Pareto'. ANTI-FABRICATION: p params: chapter |
run_buffer_tradeoff | Buffer Tradeoff experiment — sweep a buffer's capacity from 50 → 10,000 units, measure throughput gain. Shows the diminishing-returns elbow for buffer sizing. Only defined on `bs4-ct` and `bs4-leds`; each chapter has THREE inline buffers with different placements (pass `buffer` id to pick one). Compare CT vs LEDS on the same slot to see why interrupt-detail level changes buffer ROI math (e.g. b3: params: chapter, buffer |
explain_concept | Definitional primer for ReliaSim's framework concepts — Constraint, Buffer, Interrupt, Converter, cascading losses, OEE, Gain/Loss methodology, Buffer Tradeoff. Returns bundled theory content, NOT interpretation of any specific simulation run. Use for 'what is X?' / 'how does X work?' / 'explain the framework' questions. For line-specific claims (throughput, availability, what-if), call the sim to params: concept* |
compare_chapters | Side-by-side comparison of two chapters — tracks, topology, OEE, throughput, headline bottleneck. Output is sim-derived (no interpretation drift). Use for 'how does X compare to Y?' / 'what's the difference between Constraint-Level and LEDS-Level on the same model?' / 'what changes when we add buffers?' questions. ANTI-FABRICATION: per-chapter OEE/throughput numbers are real reference values; the params: chapter_a*, chapter_b* |
Entries describe changes in tool definitions. They are not statements about a server, its quality or its author. The grade measures how the tool definitions fit model providers (token cost, schema compatibility, confusable names) as scored by the ToolFit engine at the time of the listing. JSON: append .json. Opt-out: how or hello@youraitools.co.